Hello my Loyal Readers! I'm sorry I've been MIA lately. I will try to do better this week. We are in the middle of moving and getting ready to take a vacation, so it's been a little hectic. Are you guys as stoked as I am about David Cook winning American Idol? I Love that Guy!!! He has been my fav since before they picked the top 24!! Maybe a new blog coming??
Create your own banner at mybannermaker.com!
Apple iTunes

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

Did Hannah Montana Star Miley Cyrus Bail Out Jamie Lynn Spears?


Britney Spears little sister Jamie Lynn Spears shocked the entertainment world when she wound up pregnant at sixteen and announced it to the world in a tabloid interview. At sixteen and pregnant the younger sister of Britney Spears looked like she was well on her way to turning off her youngest fans' parents. Enter Hannah Montana star Miley Cyrus. She will now be staring back at people in the check out lines looking dreadful in a topless photo that will be published in Vanity Fair.
Did Hannah Montana Star Miley Cyrus Bail Out Jamie Lynn Spears?Did the Disney star just bail out Jamie Lynn Spears with her latest volley of pictures? Many people are already screaming at the parents of Miley Cyrus and wondering exactly what they were thinking when they allowed the young star to disrobe and have her picture snapped for the magazine.
***Now it seems like a catfight with Vanity Fair and Disney. It was not hard to see this coming. Miley Cyrus has been pushing the envelope for some time with her racy photos showing off way too much skin for may to be comfortable with as she is only fifteen years old. She says she sorry for the latest shoot and claims that she trusted the wrong people.The Vanity Fair photo shoot is here. We will see in a few days if this even hurts the career of Miley. She posed in her underwear and was rewarded by CMT as they just had her hosting the CMT Awards show with her dad. What do the parents of the under ten years old fans of Hannah Montana and Jamie Lynn Spears do now?

Source: National Ledger

No comments: